Effect of fluoroscopy-guided manual lymph drainage


Effectiveness of fluoroscopy-guided manual lymph drainage for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a randomised controlled trial

Objectives: Lymphoedema is a dreadful complication following breast cancer therapy. According to the International Society of Lymphology, the consensus treatment for breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is the decongestive lymphatic therapy. This is a two-phase treatment and combines different treatment modalities including skin care, manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), compression therapy and exercise. However, the additional effect of MLD is debated since pooled data only demonstrated a limited non-significant additional value. A possible explanation is that in previous studies MLD has been applied blind, without knowledge of patient-specific lymphatic routes of transport. In addition, the MLD hand manoeuvres used by the therapists in previous studies, possibly did not optimally stimulate lymphatic transport. Recently, near-infrared fluorescence imaging has been introduced to visualise the superficial lymphatic network which allows MLD at the most needed location. The aim of the present study is to determine the effectiveness of the fluoroscopy-guided MLD, additional to the other parts of the decongestive lymphatic therapy and compared to the traditional or a placebo MLD, in the treatment of BCRL. Study design: A three-arm double-blinded randomised controlled trial will be conducted in different university hospitals in Belgium. Based on a sample size calculation, 201 participants with chronic BCRL stage 1 or 2 of the arm or hand, with at least 5% difference between both sides (corrected for hand dominance) need to be recruited. All participants receive the standard treatment: skin care, compression therapy and exercises. The intervention group additionally receives fluoroscopy-guided MLD. One control group additionally receives the traditional ‘blind’ MLD and a second control group receives a placebo MLD. All subjects receive 3 weeks of daily intensive treatments and 6 months of maintenance treatment. Follow-up period is 6 months. The primary outcomes are the reduction in lymphoedema volume of the arm/hand and the change in stagnation of lymph fluid at level of the shoulder/trunk.

> CarEdOn primary researchers: Prof. Nele Devoogdt, Prof. An De Groef, Dr. Tessa De Vrieze

> Research partners: Dr. Sarah Thomis, center for lymphedema, University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium); Dr. Ines Nevelsteen, Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium); Prof. Nick Gebruers, dpt of rehabilitation sciences and physiotherapy, UAntwerp (Belgium); Dr. Wiebren Tjalma, Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Antwerp University Hospital (Belgium); Dr. Jean-Paul Belgrado, Lymphology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles (Belgium); Dr. Liesbeth Vandermeeren, Domus Lymfologica (Belgium)

> Funding: Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology, applied Biomedical Research (IWT 150178)

> Keywords: Secondary edema, manual lymphatic drainage, compression therapy, exercise therapy, educational interventions, edema, upper limb function, near-infrared fluorence imaging

> Contact: nele.devoogt@kuleuven.be ; tessa.devrieze@kuleuven.be  

Starting date
Status reference